June 2012
DUMPSTERS DUMBASS POSTS This is where you can paste dumbass posts from any room for others to enjoy.Remember it is all in your hands so go for it!(At this stage I think I will reset it each month and like the Best & Worst Award I may create a prize and list the top 3 entries)
posted by osmosis_bin_lederhosen at Friday, June 01, 2012
314 Comments:
hi to dumpster and A4
hello back,
sam xx
b_man_777: franky, when are you going to try to move here....
franky_wears_ck: bman i dont have a Citizenship
franky_wears_ck: I wish I could have dual to work in USA and Mexico
franky_wears_ck: I know i could be as bright as another star of the American flag
mix_elizabeth_anne: I need to call FBI headquarters and report this cloning epidemic in the chatroom
mix_elizabeth_anne: please, let's not be violent in the chatroom, I'm a cop you know.
mix_elizabeth_anne: franky this room is a mental clinic, and I'm the warden
hahahaha that's even funnier than the tony clone
sagwaaus: May the souls in purgatory that can help sound come back to this room for the honor and glory of God please help us
Kudos to Saggy von Baggy for always being on the cutting edge of good Catholic doctrine (cough.) Is she trying to pick a fight, so she can scream Rosary persecution if someone bites? Notice she posted this after several others posted that they were having “difficulties with sound.” Maybe chatroom Rosary went too well for her comfort during her absence, so she had to pull something to put her back in the spotlight.
Anyways, this is newadvent on whether the poor souls in Purgatory can actually intercede for anyone, sources properly cited. I hope the august prefect of the Chatroom Doctrines of the Faith does not object too much.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12575a.htm
Invocation of Souls
Do the souls in purgatory pray for us? May we call upon them in our needs? There is no decision of the Church on this subject, nor have the theologians pronounced with definiteness concerning the invocation of the souls in purgatory and their intercession for the living. In the ancient liturgies there are no prayers of the Church directed to those who are still in purgatory. On the tombs of the early Christians nothing is more common than a prayer or a supplication asking the departed to intercede with God for surviving friends, but these inscriptions seem always to suppose that the departed one is already with God. St. Thomas (II-II.83.11) denies that the souls in purgatory pray for the living, and states they are not in a position to pray for us, rather we must make intercession for them. Despite the authority of St. Thomas, many renowned theologians hold that the souls in purgatory really pray for us, and that we may invoke their aid. Bellarmine (De Purgatorio, lib. II, xv,) says the reason alleged by St. Thomas is not at all convincing, and holds that in virtue of their greater love of God and their union with Him their prayers may have great intercessory power, for they are really superior to us in love of God, and in intimacy of union with Him. Francisco Suárez (De poenit., disp. xlvii, s. 2, n. 9) goes farther and asserts "that the souls in purgatory are holy, are dear to God, love us with a true love and are mindful of our wants; that they know in a general way our necessities and our dangers, and how great is our need of divine help and divine grace".
When there is question of invoking the prayers of those in purgatory, Bellarmine (loc. cit.) says it is superfluous, ordinarily speaking, for they are ignorant of our circumstances and condition. This is at variance with the opinion of Francisco Suárez, who admits knowledge at least in a general way, also with the opinions of many modern theologians who point to the practice now common with almost all the faithful of addressing their prayers and petitions for help to those who are still in a place of purgation. Scavini (Theol. Moral., XI, n. 174) sees no reason why the souls detained in purgatory may not pray for us, even as we pray for one another. He asserts that this practice has become common at Rome, and that it has the great name of St. Alphonsus in its favour. St. Alphonsus in his work the "Great Means of Salvation", chap. I, III, 2, after quoting Sylvius, Gotti, Lessius, and Medina as favourable to his opinion, concludes: "so the souls in purgatory, being beloved by God and confirmed in grace, have absolutely no impediment to prevent them from praying for us. Still the Church does not invoke them or implore their intercession, because ordinarily they have no cognizance of our prayers. But we may piously believe that God makes our prayers known to them". He alleges also the authority of St. Catharine of Bologna who "whenever she desired any favour had recourse to the souls in purgatory, and was immediately heard".
Isn't it the church's stance that Purgatory is not a place, but a state of being and the soul is away from God during the purification period. That being said, how would a soul know to pray if they were away from God?
st. thomas aquinas agrees with you, anon. tradition from the days of the early church (maybe earlier, from the maccabean kings) has the living praying for them, not asking them for intercession.
6/02/2012 09:35:00 AM: interesting point. my understanding of catholic doctrine is that the souls in purgatory died in a state of grace, but are in a state of purgation, or temporal punishment for venial sin. Thus if they are in a state of grace, they are not in separation from God. the contention seems to lie in whether they, in their temporal state of punishment, still apart from the heavenly communion of saints, are in a condition to hear petitions for intercession from the living.
This is a good topic Anon. I don’t give as much thought to the poor souls in purgatory as I ought although almost every week at mass the names of recent deceased are mentioned then of course we all say the prayer for the (entire) Faithful Departed. I think of them as being in more need of *our* prayers than the other way around.
**CCC states: 958 Communion with the dead. "In full consciousness of this communion of the whole Mystical Body of Jesus Christ, the Church in its pilgrim members, from the very earliest days of the Christian religion, has honoured with great respect the memory of the dead; and 'because it is a holy and a wholesome thought to pray for the dead that they may be loosed from their sins she offers her suffrages for them. Our prayer for them is capable not only of helping them, but also of making their intercession for us effective.**
Do they have a different level of prayer to our own? Do their intercessory prayers differ from ours (the living) or from the intercession of a soul (saint) who has made it to heaven? If they are able to *hear* our prayers, would the extent of their intercession be limited to those prayers for our spiritual welfare and graces, as opposed to material benefits or trite requests?
Ruby
x
ruby: you nailed it again. it's either "st. ______, pray for our intentions," or "ruby, can you remember me in your prayers today," or "let's all pray for the souls in purgatory."
"souls in purgatory, if you can look past being scorched in purifying fire and ask God to fix my sound server, that would be really cool" stretches the bounds of credulity.
anthony.catholic72: g'day
anthony.catholic72: Pikles caught a bird
anthony.catholic72: No, it was still alive
anthony.catholic72: I had to rescue it
anthony.catholic72: He came back from his walk with something in his mouth
anthony.catholic72: A live bird
YAWWWWWWWWN
Interesting points, but if one dies in a state of grace then one is assured their place in heaven and not purgatory. If one goes to confession and gets hit by a bus as one leaves church. Chances are they go straight to heaven. Isn't that why the dying are giving the Sacrament of the Sick and Dying? So Heaven is assured?
CCC 1030-2 says that purgatorial souls are heaven-bound. the teaching of the church says purgatory is a temporal (temporary) state where venial sins are burned off like dross before the soul, finally purged of sin, receives an ultimate beatific vision of God.
Ruby:
Is the rosary a a special devotion, intrinsic to the Catholic Church, powerful and efficacious for souls in need, and a lively expression of faith in God and life in the Church? Of course.
Are baptized and confirmed Catholics allowed by the Church to theologize freely on matters where the Holy Magisterium has not ruled definitively? Hoo-rah.
Will the introduction of such matters in a Rosary devotion help induce a prayerful and meditative atmosphere, or distract the minds of the faithful from the matter at hand? You tell me.
Sincerely,
Arn O'Neill Moos
x
fervent_muse aka belleatchantry was in the room at the time so maybe they really were being lagged or sound booted.
6/02/2012 11:06:00 AM **"souls in purgatory, if you can look past being scorched in purifying fire ...etc...**
Anon I can see where you're coming from. On the face of it, it seems a ludicrous request, but it has sparked off an exchange of ideas and opinions from which we can learn, hopefully?
6/02/2012 10:00:00 PM Arn. In chat or in here, some of us express theological opinions on a matters of disagreement among Catholics. Whether we're expressing the true teachings of Tradition Scripture and/or the Magisterium we don't always know. So yes I believe we do theologise in a *basic apologetical* way on matters where the Magisterium hasn't ruled definitively and even where it has. Whether that's permissible on the former, I really don't know.
Practice makes perfect. They say. Rosary has been ongoing in chat for years so I imagine that the devotional and meditative state of those long term participants is being perfected day by day. For me, not so much. I tend to drift off to check on the babies, answer a phone call or a PM. I can't say *definitively* whether these matters are helpful or otherwise for the others.
Ruby
ruby: "to everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose, under Heaven." a time to reflect, a time to debate .....
claire_chikigi231812: Amen gay sheila's health, protection, wisdom, knowledge, spiritual guidance, Lord we humbly pray
________
Amen for Tony, the gayest sheila in the room.
ruby you are NOT qualified to make theological statements, and from what i see in chat, you are sadly lacking at apologetics
she is qualified to speak or say anything she wants, same as you are.
How is anyone going to better themselves in apologetics if they don't participate in such dialog. Isn't it better to learn from each other? I would think that would be the "catholic" thing to do. Just saying. :)
as soon as she came into room after saying" im back" she said
kpeg2004: I am going to quit kissing my husband
kpeg2004: he reaks of cigar smoke and pipe smoke
sat.5/19/2012
kpeg2004: pond,urgent care called me
ponddwellernice: oh, peg? what about?
kpeg2004: they found a lesion on my sholuder
ponddwellernice: a lesion????
kpeg2004: it is called a cystic degeneration
ponddwellernice: oh dear...I've not heard of that,
peg
kpeg2004: it means my bones and muscles are failing
ponddwellernice: there's treatment for that right, peg?
kpeg2004: ty,marci,i hope it was caught earley
kpeg2004: i know you spend the rest of your life in a wheelchsir
kpeg2004: chair
From a zit or boil????
now it's a torn rotator cuff whicj rewuires therapy and or orthoscopic surgery which is practially done in doctors office.
or rest and ice and lose weight if needed. peggy stop reafing the med pages.
reading*
ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww tmi
every Catholic adult is required to know correct teaching, tradition and scripture. there is one body of doctrine, one body of traditions, one scripture; and 1 pt 3:8 calls upon us to agree among ourselves and be sympathetic, love each other, have compassion and be self-effacing. i take this to mean that the spirit of christian love should prevail even when correcting a brother or sister's error.
correcting is fine, however I feel you were trying to belittle Ruby, now that's not the right thing and you know it.
sam xx
sam: i wasn't 6/03/2012 09:51:00 AM. in fact i was posting to him or her to call attention to his or her personal statements against ruby, and to cite a biblical source on how we should show compassion towards each other, even as we are called to agree on points of teaching.
i also think 6/03/2012 09:51:00 AM was trying to belittle ruby btw
6/03/2012 09:51:00 AM
We are all qualified to make theological statements. Even works of art can *make* a theological statement.
6/03/2012 09:22:00 PM
I agree with you Anon. As anon 6/03/2012 02:47:00 PM says, how can we learn if we don't dialogue, and we can learn from our mistakes too.
Ruby
As Catholics we should encourage and support each other. Learn from each other. I feel lack of those things is why Catholic chat is falling apart. I remember back when it was a place to learn more about the faith. I miss those ideas. Catholic turned on catholic because they didn't agree with a certain statement or thought. Instead of discussing things people were ridiculed. I long for the good old days but I fear they won't return.
i can disagree with ruby or whomever on points of doctrine but like and respect her as a person. and catholic chat is not falling apart, it may just be going through a changing or the regulars. and imho cc1 is actually better now than "before." when chatters like joanofarc would threaten to tear newbies who disagreed with her a new a*hole
grendal_axethrower: filipina's are quite remarkable women
grendal_axethrower: and bitchy as all fucking hell
Catholic chat isn't falling apart? Are you stupid? Do you not see how many people have left? Do you not see how the numbers have dwindled down to practically nothing compared to what they used to be? Reality evades you, doesn't it?
Anon 6/04/2012 08:07:00 AM: ironically, DAP is turning out to be a much better forum for Catholic discussion because of the medium. People posting here can take their time, think things out, cite sources or links without having to flow with the pace of real-time convo as in chatrooms. Bloggers like LWG who have a talent for a well-turned phrase are also more at their element here. If the topics in DAP have turned more to theological things, thanks go to chatters like Ruby.
6/04/2012 10:36:00 AM tsk tsk tsk so many personal statements. Charity evades you, doesn't it?
11 AM DAP standard time, and people are chatting amiably in the room
6/04/2012 10:36:00 if thats how you treat chatters, they will leave
6/04/2012 11:07:00 AM i've seen worse and i aint left yet :P
roomingfree: maybe juanny can splain it
juanny52: explain what
juanny52: splain what rooming, are you talking about the fucky fucky
6/04/2012 10:36:00 AM go to sleep tony :))
lwg is a disgusting person who ridicules and attacks decent people. i see no theological discussion from ruby here
kpeg2004: Plus I am very intellegent,and have alot of skills you do not need to know about!
kpeg2004: your a mental case rooming
kpeg2004: we are getting security cameras in our house
kpeg2004: we will have one in every room
kpeg2004: I have a maid come in once a week
kpeg2004: so if anyone else has a problem cause I do not do housework speak now!
kpeg2004: rooming,my husband said your talking out your ass!
kpeg2004: we are getting security cameras in our house
kpeg2004: we will have one in every room
kpeg2004: I have a maid come in once a week
kpeg2004: we will have one in every room
roomingfree: peg people can hack your pc and use them cameras to catch you and you know who makn whoopie in other places beside the bedroom and sell it on line for porn
kpeg2004: so if anyone else has a problem cause I do not do housework speak now!
roomingfree: peg people can hack your pc and use them cameras to catch you and you know who makn whoopie in other places beside the bedroom and sell it on line for porn
kpeg2004: rooming,my husband said your talking out your ass!
kpeg2004: lol
kpeg2004: stupid person you are rooming
kpeg2004: I just leave the house dirty untill the maid comes
quinlan31: there is always a moron or two in chat, I think it's a yahoo rule
congratulations you fat fuck. your so disgustingly obese, your the size of 4 people already
wow tony's still awake. :))
[chatter's name deleted]: Mary Mother of God and Co Redemptrix and Mediatrix of all graces interceed for us
_______
Just my opinion, but I think inserting non-doctrine (co-redemptrix) between two items of good doctrine (Mother of God, Mediatrix)during public prayer was distracting.
hey rooming you plan on jacking her cctv and showing her "skills" on the net for 99c a minute? :))
tony's boobs the size of two morons + his arse cheeks two more = 4 moron tony
I really like how this has become more of a Catholic directed blog than just slamming on people. Much better. Perhaps a name change, from Dumbass posts, to something else is in order?
I came to know and like this page as Dumbass Posts. Theology 501 may be had at your nearest Catholic grad school, and Catholic Chat 1 is still open for business, but Dumbass Posts occupies a unique place in the Blogosphere.
Maybe when Osmo gets back he can make a separate section for religious talk.
http://www.usccb.org/upload/Doctrinal_Assessment_Leadership_Conference_Women_Religious.pdf
This is the CDF's Doctrinal Assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, recently made public. Interesting reading.
sam: just got back from a4. when did mix say that? dat doity rat .....
catholic dap and debbul dap? am fine with just one dap hahaha.
http://anunslife.org/2012/06/01/lcwr-responds/
And here is the LCWR's brief response to the CDF's findings.
CAPITALIZATION: the distinction between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.
6/05/2012 03:42:00 AM
I showed that link to Kelbo a few weeks ago (under one of his IDs). So I've been following some of the articles in the Catholic Herald. Lots of info online too. (Try the Whispers in the Loggia weblog.) The CDF's rapping of LCWR's knuckles isn't surprising once you wade through the mountain of data and see exactly where the radical feminists in the group are taking it.
Ruby
read the lwcr response too: it is not so much a point-by-point response as a public declaration of what they intend to do about it. i suppose you have to show a nun, not tell a nun, even if you're the cdf. :))
I've read it now missed it earlier.
**The board members raised concerns about both the content of the doctrinal assessment and the process by which it was prepared. **
Why are the LWCR feigning surprise at the doctrinal assessment? The CDF raised these concerns back in 2001.
Can't wait for the showdown with the CDF, even the Vatican needs its guard dogs. Poor +Sartain stuck between a Rock and a hardfaced group of Aging Baby Boomers. No offence. I just don't believe the LCWR are representative of the thousands of cloistered and other contemplative *nuns* and sisters in the USA.
Ruby
aq_aqs_sandbox: 8 GRAND KIDS, 3 KIDS, THEIR 2 SPOUSES, THE 2 SIBLINGS, ETC
aq_aqs_sandbox: THEY ARE WIPED OFF MY iPHONE AND ALL THE CALENDARS NOW
aq_aqs_sandbox: MATTER OF A FACT I WONT EVEN ARRANGE FOR THAT LAST BABY TO GET IT'S BEAR I HAVE DONE FOR ALL THE OTHER GRANDKIDS
aq_aqs_sandbox: HE WILL HAVE TO FIGURE THAT OUT ON HIS OWN TOO
alimex_137: aqua, you have reason to feel the way you do, but it's not that little baby's fault for him/her not to get his bear
aq_aqs_sandbox: AL I MEX NOT MY CONCERN
aq_aqs_sandbox: HIS DAUGHTER HAS MADE IT QUITE CLEAR WHO IS WELCOME AROUND HER HOUSE.
aq_aqs_sandbox: AND AFTER 20 YEARS OF HER SHITTY BEHAVIOR I AM DONE
aq_aqs_sandbox: 20 YEARS WAS THE CUT OFF
aq_aqs_sandbox: KCUNT IS JUST DRUG ADDLED. NO REASON TO WASTE YOUR TIME
20 years of there shitty behavior????? lmfao the shitty one looks to be aqua, back in chat with her bitching and boring the fuck out of ppls with her dysfunctional family crap
now shes back in chat, we can excpect more aqua shitty behavior. shame really, room was seemsing to improve much
I disagree,,,actually chatting about the catholic faith,,,under a "dumbass posts" heading......hugely accurate...
yeah i wish os did a section for the chatting about the catholic faith, an leave dumbass posts for dumbass catholic bashers, like you anon above
bill_compton_la: that aq is one frustrated female
bill_compton_la: her favorite words are hate, torture
bill_compton_la: shooting people
bill_compton_la: doesn't really have a very nice comportment
Ruby: Hehe "feigning surprise" that they got a copy of the doctrinal assessment when it was issued, but timing the surprise when it was publicly released years later? Another neat psych-out trick that I noticed was the LWCR acting AS IF they were an autonomous or co-equal body with the CDF. I don't think there will be a showdown; maybe there will be a voice from the CDF reminding them of certain errors of their leadership and their vow of obedience. And maybe another voice from Pope Benedict's office if things aren't resolved. As for their representation: that is something they will have to resolve on their own.
6/05/2012 12:03:00 PM awwww, widdle dwagon feels out of place in catholic chat despite sucking up to the bullies and nomming them numb :))
6/05/2012 12:48:00 PM good point, but just in my opinion, the theology posters and classic dumbass posters can co-exist in one place coz they're the same people.
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19900524_theologian-vocation_en.html
DONUM VERITATIS: the horse's mouth on theologians and their vocation. It does not say who is "qualified" to post in DAP. (bwaha)
**(31)....Although theological faith as such then cannot err, the believer can still have erroneous opinions since all his thoughts do not spring from faith.(32) Not all the ideas which circulate among the People of God are compatible with the faith.**
That's what she said!
Number 37 in the document is interesting. I wonder if the CDF will (or already has) mentioned that in their dealings with the LCWF.
Ruby
Ruby read it again, the entirety of 34 and 35 in particular. Your excerpt makes a distinction between one individual's opinion (w/c may not spring from faith and therefore be erroneous)and the faith of the Church as a whole.
6/06/2012 08:53:00 AM
Anon. I posted the excerpt precisely because of the distinction it made. It is self explanatory. And I agree entirely with 34 and 35 (How could I not? It reads like Pope Benedict but doesn't say who the author is. Do you know?) It made me think of Jimmy Akin he's one of those very well known Apologists you'll find in the corridors of EWTN but he has some very questionable opinions on transubstantiation.
What is the Latin phrase that means *Reader Beware*?
Ruby
x
Permissum lector caveo (let the reader beware)
The education system at work
glasgow.doll: im tired of everyone thinking im from some town in scottland call glasgow
which i didnt even know existed until a few days ago -_______-
It is appreciated the effort Ruby is making to research the catholic topics she is posting about, kudos! but maybe Ruby should consider creating her own blog for this material, is it really appropriate posting religious material on a blog called *dumbass*?
Ruby: could be Benedict. DV I think dates from the old HCDF and Benedict's prefect days.
I also think it commendable that Ruby has introduced threads dealing with serious matters of the Church here in DAP; and am pleasantly surprised at the brisk business they’re doing. However, if she were to take such things elsewhere, it might (inadvertently) constitute a sort of reverse-censorship: is theology too good for us regular DAP-dwelling anonymice? Just my own two cents on the matter: people will talk about things great and small somewhere they’re comfortable. She didn’t bring a bunch of cardinals into DAP; the people responding to her posts and posting their own views on the matter are also DAP regulars. If she wants to open a page of her own, it’s her call, but I for one am fine with theology right here in DAP.
6/07/2012 12:22:00 AM
I so agree!!!
roomingfree: it gets to a certain age and that thing down there on a gal looks like an old catchers mitt...
6/07/2012 12:22:00 AM
I totally agree with you Anon. The Church is dealing with serious matters and as members we are able express our opinions so why not here with people we know?
I'm not a topic starter. There are other anonymous posters to thank (or blame, depending on the state of your moral character) for the turn in tone but I'm enjoying researching the issues that come up.
One Anon said *a time to reflect, a time to debate .....* I agree with that too.
6/06/2012 06:05:00 PM
I wouldn't know how to create a sophisticated style of blog like this and don't want to. There is a saying *don't judge a book by its cover* (is that biblical?) which can be applied to the DAP blog. Osmosis the owner doesn't post much but it's obvious he is a very intelligent person.
Ruby
the entire lederhosen family is highly intelligent, but what's really cool about it is none of them are conceited.
ruby if you have the time to look up all that theological information, you have time to find out how to create your own blog. the key is you DON'T want too which is fine but don't use the excuse that you don't know how
6/07/2012 08:40:00 AM
Anon. You have no idea how I use my time and it's none of your concern. For the record *THE KEY* is I don't have THAT kind of time despite having gone on a course at College two years ago, on web page building most of which I've forgotten. And I'm not bothered one way or the other. I'm perfectly happy to use this weblog to discuss things.
I don't have to EXCUSE myself to someone who doesn't have the presence to sign HER posts yet I find myself wondering why you care enough to tell me what I want to do, or not as the case may be.
Ruby
ruby lol how do you know it wasn't a HIM who posted that little paragraph
I could research on how to make my own blog and make one, but I prefer coming to DAP cause it's the best of all worlds. It's a tested brand that's been around for years, has a big and regular readership, and someone else gets to admin. :))
- not Ruby
Bravo to -not ruby! lol
bravo for what, belonging to rubys gang of gigolos?
whats wrong with ruby talking theological stuff on the blog? I think somebodies a jealous, cripple hint,hint 6/07/2012 01:42:00 PM
yes I agree, Bravo for Ruby, I see nothing wrong with her posting on dap. She is a reg. and so are all the posters.
The true definition of "dumbass", posting about the faith on a blog with that heading. DUHHHHHHHHHH put your dunce caps on.
mix_eli: when we had batons there was never a problem with resisting arrest
mix_eli: braine after I retired I trained to be a Private Banker but 9-11 came and I lost my new employer
he's a Private Banker, a banker for money, banks what you tell him to do ....
so this is why i've resisted putting mix on iggy ... he provides hours on hours of pure dumbass entertainment :))
dragonstone00: im thankful i didnt have cabbage farts from last night
Just read mix accolades menu 11,very funny shit, go take a look ha ha
you have farts alla the time but they come out your mouth
belleatchantry: we are so into the health food here we don't often get treats, but enjoy when they happen
behlerp: ms belle .. are you back to being a vegan?
belleatchantry: see his doctor aqua, we don't have doctors here, sounds worrying
behlerp: ms belle? you don't have doctors there? are you kidding me??
behlerp: what third world jungle do you live in that doesn't have doctors, ms belle?
ps:
hello back to LWG
toodles,
hello_kitty
yeah anon i read mix accolades this morning. there's some great new stuff and mix is worth 5 ordinary dumbasses.
READ THE LAST FEW MONTHS ON DAP AND MIXS COMMENTS THAT WERE POSTED, THEY SHOULD BE OB HIS PAGE...lmao
ON HIS PAGE*
Belle is as always, an idiot. There are doctors where she lives. What belle needs is a trip to a psychiatric hospital.
yeah some sociopaths are hilarious but the best way to view them is from far away
This comment has been removed by the author.
lil mixie throwin a tantrum ... if his neck really got broken we'd have no one to laugh at :))
kracken_yolks went to the other catholic rooms begging for people to attend rosary in cc4. notorious for their hate and pray rosary is it any wonder they don't have participants.
6/09/2012 08:44:00 PM nailed it in one. Belleatchantry displays lot of sociopathic behavior,but even from across the pond she damages people, but mostly of all herself
maxwell_will_kick_yo_ass: mix is a 75 year old dragqueen
mix_eli: max enjoy the bin for tonight
awww someones feelings got hurt.
i was talking about mix when i said sociopath, but belleatchantry is another baby jane watson case. :P
if mixie iggies everyone laughing at him, the only ones left on his screen will be bots and muslims
maxwell_will_kick_yo_ass: mix is my pet, i feed it lines about kids in the park and it starts foaming at the mouth
roomingfree: it gets to a certain age and that thing down there on a gal looks like an old catchers mitt...Tongue
filth!
p033um: left the room 12:56:20
belleatchantry: joined the room 12:57:55
belle: tongue filth? you make your own dumbass posts hahahahahahaha.
anon if you meant TONY when you said "belle-damaged people across the pond," tony has been a prick to jeannie, sam, ruby, deeva and countless others. he has shown no signs of making it right with them or of wanting to stop being a pompous nutbag. so his air of injured merit is laughable.
it gets to a certain age and that po33um down there on an ole cow looks like a richard simmons wig with a big dried apricot in the middle
VILE! (sputter sputter)
same old belle and tony bashing crap in this blog. isnt it time to get over your jealousy?
bring back the theology posts
oh good heavens! enough of the theology posts
ingen_man: richard no that is mix lol
king_james2328: this genio guy isnt the one we know is it..
ingen_man: richard is me
krazywriter: no, its a clone, richard
ingen_man: dood
ingen_man: the other one is the clone
king_james2328: these clones getting on my nerves..
ingen_man: mix clone you are fake, be a dude and admit and bow to ingen
mix_lilly: ingen you called me a liar before
mix_lilly: and that is just an awful untruth
ingen_man: mix clone dude I did
mix_lilly: I never lie, I just bullshit
mix_lilly: ingen are bearded clams endangered?
ingen_man: <clam diver
mix_lilly: the hot is intense? what hot, my hot bod?
mix_lilly: I got into Disenyland for free because I'm in law enforcement
mix_lilly: all FBI agents get a free ride on the tea cups
6/11/2012 01:50:00 PM go to sleep belle
bring back the tony clone!
Dang, the entrance fee gets you on the rides, I don,t think mix has been to Disneyland lol,,btw I loved the teacup ride,x
Sam xx
ewwwwwww whod wanna ride the dried up old teacup????
krazywriter: room's pretty dead... second shift hasn't come in yet.
krazywriter: its 2:00a here... UK group should start coming in soon.
krazywriter: Haven't gone to bed yet.. was up working
krazywriter: ahh, writing
dose anyone beleive this bullshit about writing a book? krazy spends 24/7 in chat, how can she find time to write?
same way you can spend all day watching this blog and coming in and out of cc1 in your many IDs, Belle.
6/12/2012 04:48:00 AM
hello kitty sounds like it could be belles stalker, cause i have never seen that id in chat, yet it seems to think it knows all
belle wishes it had a stalker. mix wanna volunteer? :))
richard has many id's but he talks (the room to tears) in all of them.
hey sam yeah you pay the entrance up front cause you don't figure you spend half the day queuing up :P
mix and belle would make the perfect couple, both of em lie alla time, both of em to stupid to know when to quit =))
kpeg2004: I am so glad they have them tests for colon cancer
kpeg2004: I cannot take another colonaskpy
now she has colon cancer? lol
lmao
6/12/2012 02:29:00 PM kpeg would follow aliens around just on the chance they'd probe her big ole (_|_)
yawn
behlerp: hello catholics
anthony.catholic72: hello freak
behlerp: drinking already tony?
anthony.catholic72: No..just calling a spade.
behlerp: i love when you get drunk and produce one of those youtube videos of you preaching.. it's hilarious
anthony.catholic72: No...you don't have to get drunk to be an idiot.
behlerp: you mean you weren't drunk when you did that?
LMFAO
anthony.catholic72: I don't think you understood it.
behlerp: i was laughing too hard... you're right, i couldn't concentrate
anthony.catholic72: It really wasn't aimed at your level of intellect.
behlerp: more aimed to the ordinary street drunk?
anthony.catholic72: I stand by that video on baptism.
anthony.catholic72: (if you are referring to that)
behlerp: do you do that sort of thing often? you really should market it.. people would get a kick out of it
anthony.catholic72: And I don't give a crap if a small minded moron like you criticises it.
behlerp: i'm not criticizing it.. i thought it was hilarious.. job well done
anthony.catholic72: What was funny?
anthony.catholic72: Like I said, I don't give a crap if a small minded idiot like you finds it amusing...it wasn't aimed at you.
anthony.catholic72: lol
roflmfao!! note ci_gayboi,s nervous “lol” of defeat at the end =))
great job beh!!!
poke the real tony hard enough he's almost as funny as the clone
how about that audio on circumcision (or not) o great unsnipped one?
first time cia talks in months and he gets walloped :))
6/13/2012 08:03:00 AM
anthony.catholic72: No...you don't have to get drunk to be an idiot.
behlerp: you mean you weren't drunk when you did that?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
franky_wears_ck: homie i dont need to live in USA lol
franky_wears_ck: Homie USA was for me the perfect idea of a Nation, today knowing all of you from this room i dont want to im super disappointed
franky_wears_ck: Watching soldiers without legs and arms at 22 homie do you think i want to live in your nation?
another wtf moment from the king of dumbasses franky
a drunk can go to AA, a druggie can go to rehab, but you can't 12-step the dumbass out of tony.
This comment has been removed by the author.
please leave numbnuts aka tony alone, the bloke has not been the same since he was run over by a north bound freight train last summer.
Anonymous said...
a drunk can go to AA, a druggie can go to rehab, but you can't 12-step the dumbass out of tony.
6/14/2012 03:04:00 AM
LMFAO, good one, anon!! Same goes for pathological liars like belleatchantry. No hope at ever 12-stepping that lying miserable ole bitch.
cia and belle dont have much to say for themselfs in these days, and nobodys complainin =))
themselves
<<<< takes up a collection (for the train)
kpeg2004: elmo.I do not need anymore water
kpeg2004: I just washed my pjs cause of leakage
that peg is one nasty bitch nobody wants to hear about her pissing her pants
who knows if she really pisses (or craps) her pants but she loves talking about it
mix_eli: tejas franky means corp clones me to insult me and lie
aq_aqs_sandbox: lying bastard
mix_eli: they are all in one gang, corps, quin, cats, ingen and someone told me trach cloned me
paranoid dumbass
mix, trach would never clone you or anyone else, he has too much class for that type of behavior. Trach is also smarter than most people in chat..is that why you don't like him?
justme_61934: Thank you for calling yourself a psycho. Enjoy yourself Engineer to be Ingenerio E.
justme_61934: Ingeniero. I wonder why you can't understand why Familiarity breeds contempt.
ingeniero_e: i never said, that I didn't understand that justmo dud
ingeniero_e: there is some truth to what you say justmo dood
justme_61934: But you have not changed Ingeniero E. You treat everybody intimately though you don't know them. By so doing, you became CONTEMPTIBLE.
ingeniero_e: justbozo dud, I suppose
justme_61934: just remember Dood Ingeniero E that when you call anyone a DOOD, remember you are the MOST DOOD OF ALL. An engineer to be but not yet.
ingeniero_e: well justbozo dud, thank you, to be called the "Most Dood" is a compliment of biblical proportions cause dood = ultra cool dude
trachcare is smart AND kind: a type not seen too often in chat.
if christians call each other brothers and sisters i suppose justmean finds that CONTEMPTIBLE too
ing dood: justmo paid 50 bucks to take an e.e. board exam on the net and feels taken advantage of. :))
AnonymousMay 09, 2011
mix_ali: my grandpa was a british Celt
grandma a Jew, my dad's mom was a Gypsy Jew, my paternal
mix_ali: grandpa had an Albanian mom on and on.
mix_ali: lelsie my grandpa was an Italian-Greek dad with an Albanian mom and he
married a Gypsy lol
mix_eli: no rooming my grandpa mom and his grandma were turkish
that would make mix a jew. the blood line of jews is passed down maternally according to their faith and traditions. some one point him to the jewish rooms please. k thanx :D
mix is a jew, an albanian, a turk, a japanese, an italian, a kalahari bushman, a kardashian ....
Has there been any update on last Tuesday's LCWR meeting with the CDF? Or is it too early for an official document/press release?
Ruby
mix is also a wanker:-)
a kardashian? hahahahahahahahaha
6/16/2012 04:53:00 AM lmfao! A Kardashian too FFS! Damn!!!!!
Ruby:
National Catholic Reporter (online)
http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/lcwr-cdf-have-open-meeting
(google can be your best buddy too)
Thanks Anon above. I did google honest. I put in the right words but that one didn't show up. Probably because I have my *tools* set to show UK websites first. Thanks xxx
It seems the LCWR and the CDF had a *cordial* meeting. Still nothing official re the outcome and what agreements have (or not) been reached. Left to the secular media, they portray the LCWR as kind hearted, elderly sisters doing their liberal best but being totally subjugated by the male dominated CDF.
They're enjoying their status as the *poor persecuted darlings of the Church*. If they're so out of step with the Catholic Church why don't they get out from under its protective mantle.
Ruby
Ruby:
Not being an American sister or a member of the LCWR, my interest in the matter is purely one of curiosity. My "issue" with the case is how it is being reported in the secular media as a thinly-disguised brawl. At any rate, here is the text of Archbishop Peter Sartain's interview in National Catholic Reporter. This is as much as we civilians are likely to see, but imho the sordid details (don't think there are that many) are NOODB. :) http://ncronline.org/printpdf/blogs/ncr-today/sartain-lcwr-dialogue-work-progress
This is also a different sort of case than, say, the Curran incident, where one individual was called to the carpet, and the inconsistencies in his preaching pointed out. The LCWR has a membership numbering in the thousands; and this particular case needs to be handled with more delicacy. From what I am reading, the CDF is doing a good job, and exercising their functions in a spirit of Christian prudence and temperance.
6/17/2012 09:21:00 AM
Thanks for the link Anon. It was good to see +Sartain's response in print rather than paraphrased by the more liberal lefty reporters. (Actually the NCR fits that profile and is usually referred to by conservative Catholic writers as the National Catholic Fishwrap.)
I think it becomes the business of every member of the Church when some of the sisters/nuns in leadership roles within the LCWR are promoting heresies. If you look at Father Z's blog (link below) i will explain where I'm coming from and really is worth a look.
I agree it is a delicate matter because I don't believe the majority of LCWR are pro-choice but the CDF have a responsibility to point out and correct doctrinal error where they see it occur.
Ruby
Sorry I forgot the link. It's late here.
http://wdtprs.com/blog/2012/04/nuns-gone-wild-a-trip-down-memory-lane/
This is the prefect, Cardinal Levada, in your favorite fishwrap again. http://ncronline.org/blogs/exclusive-interview-levada-talks-lcwr-criticism-states
BTW the LCWR are sisters (as I have been repeatedly corrected) though several blogs refer to them as nuns. I was surprised to see the amount of blog activity on the LCWR topic: more than 5 google pages of blogspot sites.
I thought the LCWR was made up of both? Though the *leaders* of it seem to be sisters, the difference being in the vows each take. The fishwrap though, has already steered the brawl towards one of property ownership, looking at the Levada interview.
The more I learn about the leadership of the LCWR the more barmy I think they are.
Ruby
I found this beauty, penned by one of the Sisters.
***The crux of the matter, as it were, is that most of the nuns, like many Catholics, have matured beyond the Vatican’s imaginings. The notion that postmodern Catholics assent to “the doctrine of the faith that has been revealed by God in Jesus Christ, presented in written form in the divinely inspired Scriptures, and handed on in the Apostolic Tradition under the guidance of the Church’s Magisterium,” (or, simply, the fathers know best) is simply ludicrous."***
More here:
http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/politics/5908/we_are_all_nuns/
IMHO clarifies the statements I've been reading about them *moving beyond Christ*. They've become a law unto themselves and are about to implode.
Ruby
ruby has me wondering how much longer she is going to bore us all with her opinions
most american catholics don't care about the LCWR...it simply hasnt been on the catholic radar
ruby really should create her own blog instead of trying to hijack a blog owned by someone else. Afterall, this part of the dirty dumpster is called "dumbass"
ruby, the vatican's position was made clear in the original doctrinal assessment. what we are seeing now with these repeated meetings and interviews is the mopping up. it may take years, but in the middle ages, such things took centuries.
ruby's nun-ass posts, kpeg's anal leakage, sheriff mix the enforcer, franky and numbnuts just being their usual endearing selves; gotta love DAP. :))
This is what keeps American Catholics busy these days (link courtesy of cats.)
http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/religious-liberty/fortnight-for-freedom/index.cfm
6/18/2012 08:21:00 AM
I disagree for two reasons. 1. You can't speak on behalf of *most American Catholics* and 2. every single Catholic Newspaper has been reporting the LCWR issue off and on for years and more so since April. The NYT covers it regularly.
6/18/2012 08:58:00 AM
You can always lodge a formal complaint about me, to the blog owner and have me forcibly removed or join in the debate. I hate to think of you on the fringes wearing only your *dumbass* hat.
6/18/2012 09:23:00 AM
The CDF raised its concerns back in 2001. Its position is clear, it's the LCWR that is stalling the process by beating about the bush and not making their position clear. (IMHO it's clear to me they're basically protestant and haven't the integrity to admit it.)
6/18/2012 09:29:00 AM
Can't beat variety. :P
It would be good to know who's posting here sometimes though the guesswork is half the fun.
"every single catholoc newspaper" LMAO..glad to see the poster living up to the dumbass
194 Catholic dioceses in the USA and no, not all Catholic diocesan newspapers have been reporting on or off for years nor have every single Catholic diocesan newspaper reported on the LCWR since April.
6/18/2012 12:39:00 PM
6/18/2012 12:48:00 PM
Great to see you both making a contribution to the discussion. Do you have an opinion on the activities of the LCWR yourselves?
Ruby
The CDF looked into the issue in 2001, AND they also took the LCWR's gauntlet to meet with them in a free and open forum. That is the CDF being smart: free and open means the LCWR's rank and file membership can see what their leadership is up to.
real-time convo here in DAP? haven't seen this since the days of the big bad b00tah. :))
"lodge a formal complaint" ... yikes you are starting to sound like belle. (jk) :))
Yikes Anon 6/18/2012 01:10:00 PM thanks for the warning. I'll try to do better. (hangs head in a Burpy like shame)
Ruby
xx
this forum is called DUMBASS ..not appropriate for religious discussion. If osmo wanted this to be for such, he would have made it so. Thinks ruby and others should create a specific blog for religious discussion instead of trying to hijack someone's elses
why hasn't ruby and others read the mission statement of this blog?
people can post what ever is on their mind be it religious or dumbass posts , wht's wrong with that?
Post a Comment
<< Home